By Somali Magazine
MOGADISHU, SOMALIA – The Banadir Regional Court has sentenced Somali social activist and tuk-tuk driver Sacdiyo Macallin Cali, popularly known as Sacdiyo Bajaaj, to three years in prison, concluding a case that has drawn significant attention from both domestic and international human rights organizations.
The ruling comes after Sacdiyo had already spent nearly three months in detention while awaiting trial. The verdict has immediately sparked renewed debate over freedom of expression, judicial independence, and civic space in Somalia.
According to human rights organizations, Sacdiyo was arrested in April 2026 by officers of the National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) following social media posts and her participation in peaceful demonstrations. Her detention and prosecution have since become the subject of international concern.
Prior to the court’s decision, Amnesty International called for Sacdiyo Bajaaj’s immediate and unconditional release, stating that she had been arbitrarily detained solely for peacefully exercising her rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. Amnesty maintained that she should never have faced criminal prosecution for expressing her views.
In a separate joint statement, Amnesty International and several Somali and international civil society organizations criticized what they described as the Somali government’s increasing restrictions on civic space. The organizations argued that the prosecution of Sacdiyo Bajaaj reflects a broader pattern of intimidation against government critics, journalists, activists, and citizens who peacefully express dissent. They urged the Federal Government of Somalia to respect constitutional rights and comply with its international human rights obligations.
The sentencing has generated widespread reactions across social media, where many Somalis, activists, and members of civil society have expressed disappointment with the outcome of the case. Supporters argue that the decision could have a chilling effect on freedom of expression and discourage citizens from openly voicing their opinions on matters of public interest.
Legal observers note that the case is likely to attract continued scrutiny from regional and international human rights bodies, particularly regarding Somalia’s commitments under international human rights treaties protecting freedom of expression, due process, and peaceful assembly.
Somali Magazine believes that the case represents an important moment for Somalia’s justice system and democratic institutions. The judgment is expected to fuel further national and international discussion on the balance between national security, judicial independence, and the protection of fundamental freedoms guaranteed under the Somali Constitution.
At the time of publication, the Federal Government of Somalia had not issued an official statement responding to the court’s ruling or to the concerns raised by Amnesty International and other human rights organizations.
This is a developing story. Somali Magazine will continue to provide updates as more information becomes available.
Black News 
