EAC’s 2031 currency dream faces ugly reality

Countries seeking deeper economic integration may adopt a common currency to reduce exchange-rate uncertainty, eliminate currency-conversion costs, and facilitate cross-border trade.

However, countries must first meet agreed economic conditions before adopting a common currency. In Africa, two functional monetary unions currently exist: the CFA Franc zone of West and Central Africa and the Common Monetary Area in Southern Africa.

The East African Community (EAC), which comprises eight states, has embarked on a similar path, setting 2031 as the target year for a single regional currency.

The established convergence criteria are a headline inflation rate of less than 8 per cent, a fiscal deficit below 3 per cent of GDP, public debt below 50 per cent of GDP, and international reserves equivalent to at least 4.5 months of imports.

While the bloc has expanded to include South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Somalia, data limitations and ongoing institutional stabilization in these newer member states make an accurate assessment of their convergence difficult at this stage.

Based on the IMF’s April 2026 Regional Economic Outlook, the World Bank’s Africa’s Pulse, and the AfDB’s African Economic Outlook 2026, no core EAC economy meets more than two of the four primary criteria. Kenya meets the inflation and reserves benchmarks.

Uganda meets the inflation requirement but falls short on the other benchmarks. Tanzania meets the inflation and public-debt requirements but fails to satisfy the remaining standards.

Rwanda meets only the inflation requirement, while Burundi meets only the public-debt criterion. These are not just missed benchmarks on paper; they translate into economies moving through fundamentally different business cycles, which is where the risk of monetary union becomes concrete.

Despite these gaps, partner states’ central banks are making institutional progress on the EAMU roadmap. This includes modernizing and harmonizing monetary policy frameworks and strengthening regional payment systems to facilitate cross-border trade.

The challenge is that convergence remains uneven. Proceeding with monetary union before these disparities narrow could place greater adjustment costs on the better-performing economies operating under a common policy.

This is illustrated by differences in business cycles across the region. A feasibility study, Monetary Union in the East African Community: A Structural Vector Autoregression Model, found Uganda’s demand shocks moving in the opposite direction from Kenya’s, with a correlation of -0.30.

Supply shocks across the bloc’s core economies were essentially uncorrelated. If one country experiences an inflationary demand shock requiring tighter monetary policy while another faces the opposite, a single regional central bank would struggle to respond appropriately to both.

Fiscal positions present another obstacle. Uganda and Kenya have run deficits close to twice the three per cent ceiling. Persistent deficits and borrowing can intensify inflationary pressures and increase public debt, limiting a future regional central bank’s ability to maintain price stability and respond to shocks.

A second obstacle is the region’s income gap. There is roughly a 13-fold difference in per-capita income between the bloc’s richest and poorest economies, with Kenya at about $2,100 and Burundi at approximately $160.

This gap already shapes how people move across the region. Workers migrate toward economies offering stronger growth and higher incomes. A thematic report on labour migration from the 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census, published by the International Labour Organization, shows that Kenya hosted 419,135 immigrants.

Of these, 225,197 were international labour migrants, many from East African Community partner states such as Uganda and Tanzania. A third obstacle is the region’s capital markets, which reflect the same disparities.

Kenya’s financial market is the deepest and most liquid in the bloc, giving firms broader access to capital and investors a wider range of securities — an advantage smaller, thinner markets elsewhere in the region cannot match.

As of September 4, 2026, Kenya’s stock-market capitalization stood at approximately $33.3 billion, according to the Nairobi Securities Exchange, compared with Uganda’s $13.3 billion, per the Capital Markets Authority.

Although market capitalization does not directly measure cross-border capital flows, the disparity illustrates the uneven depth of the region’s financial markets. Taken together, these three gaps- fiscal, income and financial- compound each other.

Without stronger financial integration, including harmonized infrastructure and broader access to capital, a common currency could reinforce existing concentrations of private capital and disproportionately benefit economies with more developed financial systems.

Responding to concerns over the timing of the single currency and missed convergence targets, EAC Monetary Affairs Committee Chair Dr. Michael Atingi-Ego said: “A single currency cannot substitute for macroeconomic convergence. A sustainable monetary union requires participating economies to achieve a sufficient degree of convergence and maintain sound macroeconomic policies over time.

“The immediate priority should therefore be to achieve and sustain the agreed convergence criteria and complete the institutional arrangements required to support the monetary union, rather than to move immediately to a single currency.

“Partner States currently do not meet all four primary convergence criteria. Under the revised EAMU roadmap, Partner States are expected to achieve the agreed targets by 2028 and maintain them for three years leading up to the planned monetary union in 2031.”

Atingi-Ego also noted that, after adoption of a common currency, national monetary policy and exchange-rate adjustments would no longer be available to address country-specific shocks.

Adjustment would therefore have to occur increasingly through fiscal policy and other structural mechanisms.

On how the EAC monetary framework would prevent a common policy rate from being systematically too loose for faster-growing economies and too tight for slower-growing ones, Atingi-Ego explained: “Under the EAMU, monetary policy would be determined on the basis of economic and inflation conditions across the union as a whole, consistent with the mandate of the regional central bank. The common policy rate would therefore not be calibrated to the economic conditions of individual Partner States.

“Greater alignment of inflation, fiscal positions and broader macroeconomic conditions would reduce the likelihood of large and persistent differences in the monetary policy stance appropriate for individual Partner States.”

Atingi-Ego identified three mechanisms that would become particularly important in helping partner states absorb country-specific shocks. These include greater mobility of labour and capital. Regional institutions, such as the East African Development Bank, can play a stronger role in supporting investment and economic diversification.

Fiscal policy can also be used to cushion economic shocks and control demand when economies overheat. Economist Dr. Enock Nyorekwa Twinoburyo argues that the EAC should remain committed to monetary union, but that readiness should be judged by the region’s capacity to manage divergence and shocks—not simply by whether countries meet convergence criteria at a particular point in time.

He agrees that a common policy rate could be too restrictive for an economy experiencing strong investment and productivity growth or too accommodative for one facing inflationary pressures.

However, he notes that this is a standard challenge in monetary unions, not one unique to the EAC. Regarding the adjustments proposed by Atingi-Ego, Twinoburyo said: “All those fundamentals are critical. Free movement of labour and capital is what we call the common market, which is a stage before an economic or monetary union.

The realization, however, depends on several fundamentals that are contingent on political buy-in and fiscal harmonization with convergence criteria.”

He recommends that the EAC draw lessons from the European Union by adopting a graduated approach toward a common currency. The EAC has made progress toward the institutional foundations of monetary union, but its economic convergence remains incomplete.

The central question is whether the region can build the fiscal discipline, integration, institutions, and political commitment needed to absorb shocks without independent monetary and exchange-rate tools. Without these foundations, a common currency could bind together economies too different to share a single monetary policy effectively.

kidambamark3@gmail.com

The post EAC’s 2031 currency dream faces ugly reality appeared first on The Observer Media Ltd.