Court rejects Appiah Kubi’s bid to withdraw from Wontumi case
THE Accra High Court has ruled that the motion filed by Mr Andy Appiah Kubi, to withdraw his services as counsel for Bernard Antwi-Boasiako (aka Chairman Wontumi), in the Samreboi mining concession case, is not supported by any rule of court or judicial decision. Consequently, the court, presided over by Justice Audrey Kocuvie-Tay, dismissed the … The post Court rejects Appiah Kubi’s bid to withdraw from Wontumi case appeared first on Ghanaian Times.
Black News 
THE Accra High Court has ruled that the motion filed by Mr Andy Appiah Kubi, to withdraw his services as counsel for Bernard Antwi-Boasiako (aka Chairman Wontumi), in the Samreboi mining concession case, is not supported by any rule of court or judicial decision.
Consequently, the court, presided over by Justice Audrey Kocuvie-Tay, dismissed the motion and ordered the parties to file their addresses, if any, on or before June 24.
However, the date for judgement remains July 3.
Mr Kubi wanted to withdraw his services but the judge held that in criminal matters, counsel needs no leave of the court to withdraw services.
Justice Kocuvi-Tay stated that it was an issue between him and his client.
Prior to the ruling, Dr Edem Srem-Sai, the Deputy Attorney-General and Minister of Justice, moved his motion for preliminary legal objection and argued that Mr Kubi does not need the leave of court to withdraw his services.
In addition, Dr Srem-Sai told the judge that the court had no jurisdiction to hear or determine such an application.
“A court of law functions only within its jurisdiction being an application the counsel for accused person is offering the court the power to grant or refuse his decision to withdraw and that discretion is not within the jurisdiction of the court. Accordingly we pray that the motion be struck out as being incompetent,” Dr Srem-Sai reiterated.
He contended that the motion was not served on the accused but the principle of law as far as criminal trials was concerned is that a defence lawyer who wishes to withdraw services must notify the accused.
In his response to the objection, Mr Kubi said the court knew him as the counsel for the accused but the court is not ceased with knowledge of his disappointment as counsel for the accused.
He said in a recent case of Justice Araba Gertrude Torkonoo v AG, the Supreme Court gave direction that withdrawal of service before the court ought to be done by the rules of serving notice to the court.
The Office of the Attorney General preferred criminal charges against Antwi-Boasiako, a shareholder of Akonta Mining, and Kwame Antwi, a director of the company.
Antwi, the co-accused, who is charged with two counts of assignment of mineral rights without approval and purposely facilitating an unlicensed mining operation, is currently on the run.
In all, the prosecution invited four witnesses to testify against Messrs Bosiako and Akonta Mining.
Mr Henry Okum, a small-scale miner had earlier told the court that he had a verbal agreement with Mr Boasiako to mine on his concession at Samreboi.
Mr Boasiako was asked to open his defence after the court made a prima facie case against him.
His submission of no case to answer was dismissed.
BY MALIK SULLEMANA
Follow our WhatsApp Channel now! https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbAjG7g3gvWajUAEX12Q
The post Court rejects Appiah Kubi’s bid to withdraw from Wontumi case appeared first on Ghanaian Times.
