Rating agency Moody’s drops South Africa licence as regulators move to deregister unit
South African regulators have moved to deregister the local arm of Moody’s Investors Service, marking a shift in how banks will use credit ratings in one of Africa’s most developed financial markets.
South African regulators have moved to deregister the local arm of Moody’s Investors Service, marking a shift in how banks will use credit ratings in one of Africa’s most developed financial markets.
- Moody’s local unit in South Africa has been deregistered after voluntarily giving up its licence.
- Banks can still use its ratings for regulatory purposes for the next 24 months.
- The move does not affect South Africa’s sovereign rating or global Moody’s operations.
- It signals a strategic pivot towards pan-African growth and partnerships with regional agencies.
The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) said on 16 April that Moody’s Investors Service South Africa had voluntarily renounced its licence as a credit rating agency. The decision followed consultation with the Prudential Authority (PA), which supervises banks.
The move means Moody’s South African unit will no longer issue credit ratings locally or be recognised as an eligible External Credit Assessment Institution (ECAI), a status that allows banks to use ratings to calculate regulatory capital.
However, regulators have opted for a gradual transition to avoid disruption. Banks will still be allowed to use Moody’s South Africa ratings for regulatory purposes for 24 months, until April 2028, after the PA granted an extended window beyond the standard three-month period provided under the law.
The PA said it would issue updated guidance after the transition period to formally remove Moody’s South Africa from the list of recognised rating providers.
The deregistration does not affect South Africa’s sovereign credit rating, which continues to be assigned by the global Moody’s entity. Ratings on local issuers produced by Moody’s analysts outside South Africa also remain valid.
Moody’s has rated South Africa since 1994 and established a local presence in 2003, playing a key role in the development of the country’s debt capital markets.
Its South African subsidiary was formally registered as a credit rating agency in 2014, enabling banks to use its ratings for risk-weighting.
Since 2020, the unit has covered a range of government-related entities, municipalities and debt instruments.
Under the new arrangement, the company must notify all rated entities of its deregistration and retain records of its past rating activities for at least five years.
Moody’s signalled that the move reflects a broader strategy rather than a retreat from Africa. The firm said it will focus on cross-border investors and African issuers seeking international funding, while maintaining a relationship presence in Johannesburg.
It also pointed to its investment in Global Credit Ratings (GCR), which operates across multiple African markets including Nigeria, Kenya and Senegal. Moody’s said supporting GCR’s growth aligns with its long-term bet on Africa’s expanding domestic debt markets.
Analysts say the shift highlights a gradual evolution in Africa’s credit rating landscape, where global agencies are increasingly partnering with or backing regional players to deepen market coverage and local expertise.
South Africa, as a member of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, allows banks to use external credit ratings to determine minimum capital requirements. But such ratings must come from agencies formally recognised by regulators.
With Moody’s South Africa set to lose that status, banks will need to rely on other approved agencies over time.
The change comes amid a broader reassessment of South Africa’s credit profile by global agencies.
Moody’s last held the country’s rating at Ba2 with a stable outlook, while peers such as S&P Global Ratings and Fitch Ratings have maintained sub-investment grade ratings, citing fiscal pressures but also noting gradual reforms.
For now, the extended transition period is expected to cushion markets, giving banks and issuers time to adjust without triggering instability in capital calculations or funding costs.