What Does A Hit Leave Behind?

From conversations at Creative Cnergy, Ryan Enslin asks what African screen success leaves behind once the audience moves on. Pepsi Pokane says it almost as an aside. “The only difference is The Polygamist had the power of a distribution system.” The South African producer was speaking at the Creative Cnergy Policy and Investment Symposium. The […] The post What Does A Hit Leave Behind? appeared first on Time Africa.

What Does A Hit Leave Behind?

From conversations at Creative Cnergy, Ryan Enslin asks what African screen success leaves behind once the audience moves on.

Pepsi Pokane says it almost as an aside. “The only difference is The Polygamist had the power of a distribution system.”

The South African producer was speaking at the Creative Cnergy Policy and Investment Symposium. The Polygamist reached Netflix’s top 10 in 62 countries, number one in 21. Pokane resists treating that reach as proof South Africa has suddenly learned to make better television. Strong shows existed before. This one had a far larger route to market.

A hit looks different from the other side of the screen. We meet television when the programme is finished and the argument has become one of taste. Before it reaches us, money has shaped who could take the risk and what they would keep if it worked.

Under prevailing commissioning models, Pokane says, producers can be paid a fee while ownership sits elsewhere. “I can’t add shows to my balance sheet.” Success may strengthen reputation without leaving an asset that keeps earning or helps finance what comes next.

The pressure appears differently at the broadcaster. Nomsa Chabeli, group chief executive of South Africa’s public broadcaster, the SABC, describes a content budget with little room for failure. “You get funded once and it doesn’t work,” she says, and the room for a second chance contracts sharply. Familiar titles remain safer. Developing producers wait.

Monde Twala’s youth culture channel BASE Pulse is carried on DStv across 48 African countries, yet he says it meaningfully monetises only Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. Being present in a market and earning from that audience are not the same thing. “There’s still a lot that I’m leaving on the table,” he says. The signal has travelled further than the commercial relationships around it.

In Nigeria, Clarissa places African finance at the beginning. Directed by Arie and Chuko Esiri, it was financed entirely by Africa-based institutions, led by CANEX Creations and MBO Capital, before NEON acquired worldwide distribution. African finance took the production risk before the film travelled outward.

Distribution is only part of what remains after success. Once productions compete internationally, investors are also comparing the countries in which they might be made.

Karyn Temple, senior executive vice president and global general counsel of the Motion Picture Association, says producers choosing between jurisdictions weigh reliable incentives, regulatory predictability and confidence in the legal environment. “The key word, though, is certainty,” she says. Productions are planned years ahead and involve substantial financial commitments.

In South Africa, that competition meets an incentive system already being reconsidered. Its annual allocation is roughly R500 million, while applications are moving towards R1 billion a year. But the problem is also one of access. “The ones who apply for a rebate are those who have the money to start,” Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition Zuko Godlimpi says. Whatever reshapes the programme, he says, must provide “greater certainty to investors”.

Taken together, these numbers and examples make reach a poor measure of industry strength. A report can tell us where a programme was watched. It cannot tell us whether the producer finished with something that still earns. Forty-eight-country distribution tells us how far a channel travels, not how much revenue returns from those audiences. Even a successful production can leave the company behind it facing much the same financing problem it had before.

The success of a production is easy to see. What it leaves behind is harder to measure. A hit matters differently if some part of its success remains with the creatives and companies that made it, whether as ownership that keeps earning, revenue returning from new markets or greater capacity to finance what comes next.

Once the credits roll and the audience moves on, the harder accounting begins. Did the producer keep something that can earn again? Did the company become easier to finance? Did success leave enough behind to carry some of the risk of the next production?

African stories are already travelling. What matters now is whether more of the value travels back.

The post What Does A Hit Leave Behind? appeared first on Time Africa.